Hawking: 'God' did not create the universe

Hubris Goat
2 September, 2010 - 14:33

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11161493

 

More to come for the 'God'-fearing among you, esp. some heart-warming words for Donaldo..

 

 

And with all these tories coming out of the closet

exile
2 September, 2010 - 15:20
exile's picture

The world must be coming to an end.


What next Chelsea & Man Utd relegated to the 4th division for match fixing? We can only hope......

__________________

I’m known as Exile and I know where you live.

Hawkwind: Brock did create space rock

Alvin Stardusts Ring
2 September, 2010 - 15:45
Alvin Stardusts Ring's picture

One for Goofy there

Bless you my Chappers

Goofy
2 September, 2010 - 16:49
Goofy's picture

for providing me with an excuse

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YvEtqGDFPA0

I listen to that on a silver machine

Boston R
2 September, 2010 - 21:15
Boston R's picture

...to anyone under 35 that would be a record player.

We all sing

morphine apiary
2 September, 2010 - 21:52
morphine apiary's picture

"we're riding on a silver machine" in the silver seats in the south africa at half-time before the game while rattling our cheap jewellery - slike butlins except our knees can't knobble

I joined the site 3 mins ago

tony g
4 September, 2010 - 14:45
tony g's picture

I joined the site 3 mins ago and already seen my two favorate things  QPR and HAWKWIND


 

Hang around for a while

Goofy
4 September, 2010 - 17:06
Goofy's picture

and pickled eggs will come up too.

Time to pickle your eggs for Christmas

Donaldo
5 September, 2010 - 10:41
Donaldo's picture

Just pickling vinegar - no need for extra spices.  Perfecto!

it'll be allotments next...

Alvin Stardusts Ring
5 September, 2010 - 13:22
Alvin Stardusts Ring's picture

...just watch

He may well be right

Donaldo
3 September, 2010 - 08:37
Donaldo's picture

Clever chap.  As wes Newton.  And I've had a drink with that Bishop - nice chap with something sensible to say.  Anyway, why are people so keen to disprove the existence of God? 

We're not..

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 08:51

..it's having all this God bollocks foisted on you that irks us. Just like you with vegetarians.

We'd much rather you actually proved the existence of 'God'... no evidence forthcoming as yet I note..

ps. you don't need a God to experience life as wonderful, or even spiritual.. that's the wonder and joy of existence; it is multi-dimensional, ever-surprising, beyond the mind's grasp, and even allows for Luddite fundamentalists to exist.

I agree

exile
3 September, 2010 - 09:06
exile's picture

Send those Vegetarians back to Vegetaria.


We've enough bloody foreigners invading our shores........

__________________

I’m known as Exile and I know where you live.

i'm gonna start a whipround

Alvin Stardusts Ring
3 September, 2010 - 10:08
Alvin Stardusts Ring's picture

...how much do you think exile would accept to fuck off?

I'll fuck off

exile
3 September, 2010 - 11:22
exile's picture

but only if she is this hot


Between those gorgeous blue eyes not a single brain cell

Boston R
3 September, 2010 - 22:05
Boston R's picture

She's perfect.

Foisted? We've a Chistian country.

Donaldo
3 September, 2010 - 09:06
Donaldo's picture

Anyway, as Lee says, you can't prove the existence of God. You might see it as a cop-out but that's the nature of faith.  I'm not sure I'm the right person to be presenting evidence anyway. I don't know if God exists or not.  I want to beleive but I'm not sure that I can, if you get my drift.


And what's a Luddite fundamentalist?  The ultimate nihilist?  Someone who wants to reduce everything to its component parts?  An eighteenth certury ruralist?


Now where have I ever expressed an opinion on vegetarians?  Live and let live - that's my motto.

Why

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 09:43

do you want to believe in 'God' Don? That's what fascinates me. Isn't the fact that everything works, oh so sublimely, without any meddling from the intelligent monkey humans, just wonderful in itself? Can we not just accept that it is wonderful, amazing, beyond comprehension, without having to anthropomorphosize ourselves into the bloody picture?

Why do you want to believe in 'God' Don?

 

ps I like your Luddite fundamentalist definition 'Someone who wants to reduce everything to its component parts', even if it's not what I meant.

Stan

Boston R
3 September, 2010 - 09:58
Boston R's picture

is god.

Rod is God

BazWoT
4 September, 2010 - 20:04
BazWoT's picture

Stan is the man

And you

Boston R
4 September, 2010 - 22:20
Boston R's picture

are bang on.

I guess ...

Donaldo
3 September, 2010 - 10:14
Donaldo's picture

... I want the moral certainty, Hud.  Some people say life's a game.  Maybe it is so I want to know the rules.  Perhaps I'm just envious of the serenity that faith brings to some.  And also a lot of people who I know and admire have faith.


 


To think it really is ashes to ashes, dust to dust is quite depressing; frightening really.


 


And when push comes to shove, I love a good old sing-song in a mediaeval building.  No guitars though.  Faith and guitars do not mix.

But Don

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 11:10

..dear chap, not believing in 'god' doesn't mean it's all ashes to ashes, dust to dust, that's just fatalism. Surely you can see, that even without 'God' life is infinite, ever changing, and that we are, by any form of logic, all one with this wonderful universe?

I am interpreting your depressing thoughts as meaning you have a fear of 'death'? You don't need an idea of a 'God to accept that a) you have a soul (this is co-existant with the logic that we're all made of the same stuff, and that clearly life force is not a material substance in the sense that we perceive materiality) and b) that soul, or essence, is in fact infinite, and therefore by extension, immortal.

As for moral certainty, why are you afraid of divining this from WITHIN your self, as opposed to seeking some authority OUTSIDE of your self? This does not mean using your mind and its jumble of conditioning and junk programming to find moral certainty, this means allowing your self to go BEYOND the mind, into the 'body' where your feelings reside, along with all the othe stuff you've supressed, repressed, etc. etc. because your mind has told you to do so.

Are you still with me? The answer you seek, as I'm sure Joshua Ben whatisname who allegedly founded your favourite religion, said, is INSIDE you. The thing is, you've got to understand who and what 'you' are, to understand what he meant. And it doesn't mean your mind. Disassociate from your mind, from your day to day thinking, and merely observe it, and you will start to free your self from the fears and phobias that may bug you, and you will also start to see that there is a 'you' that is NOT your mind.

Whaddya reckon? Care to give it a try? What have you got to lose Donaldo? I hope you don't feel I'm fositing this on you, it's just a suggestion, but if you REALLY have a dread of 'death' and you sincerely want to find moral certainty, then surely it's worth starting the journey within? You would, after all, be following the guidance of your favourite religion.

You will also discover, beyond the hubbub of the mind, the SERENITY you seek! Oh yeah! gwan, give it a try my son.. take a deep breath, feel that life force surging through your body!

There are more things in Heaven and Earth Donaldo, than are dreamt of in your philosophy..

Cheers, Hudley

Donaldo
3 September, 2010 - 11:39
Donaldo's picture

My initial thought was "what a load of old hippy bollocks".  But that's unfair to you.  So you see a universal and infinite spirit that is in all of us?  Christians do too.  It's just you disagree with how it got there.


 


How do you disassociate from yourself?  Your very being is not something you can switch on and off.  And if you were to step outside and observe, how would you get back in?


 


You seem to think I lack self-awareness or maybe self-knowledge?  I disagree.  I know exactly who and what I am (or I know as much as I want to know) and I'm quite happy with it.  Or at least I accept me, warts and all.  I don't propose to go on a journey of self-discovery as that's just too self-centred.  My life is defined by how I interact with others - I like to look outside, not inside.  As an aside, do you ever hear of people going off to find themselves then coming back and saying "I found myself alright and I realised I'm a bit of a cunt"?  Well, sometimes they do and then they change 'for the better'.


 


What is wrong with bowing to a higher authority?  It's called humility and, as Clint said "a man's gotta know his limitations".  We're not all capable of anything despite what various fuckers would have us believe and recognising what you can and can't achieve is one of the factors of a contented life.


 


I'd also say that what you call my dread of death is actually a love of life.  The dread comes from things dropping out, falling apart and generally stopping working.  I'm with Ernest Hemingway on that score.



I shall continue to ponder what you say because it's clear that you've put a lot of thought into it and although I don't agree with some of your views, I do respect them.  At the moment, though, this approach just seems far too obsessed with self to the exclusion of all others.  I'd prefer to have a communal sing-song than sit there gazing at my own navel.

George Michael

Boston R
3 September, 2010 - 22:08
Boston R's picture

..had faith. Yeah Yeah.

What he said... and Marx

ChrisO
3 September, 2010 - 11:35
ChrisO's picture

I'm an atheist but I agree with Donaldo's point Hud.

The best reason for God is not to explain who or how the universe was created, it's to give some context to how we should live in it.

Ignoring the nutty margins, most religious teaching is just basic stuff about how to get along with other people - it's also about having a bit of respect for something or someone beyond yourself. 

Atheism is fine for sensible people like you and me Hud but when Marx described it as the opiate of the masses he also said "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions" - fucking poetry that.

And "Religion is the general theory of this world, its encyclopedic compendium, its logic in popular form, its spiritual point d'honneur, its enthusiasm, its moral sanction, its solemn complement, and its universal basis of consolation and justification."

I like the concept that religion is the logic of the world in popular form. Marx thought it could be replaced it with communist ethics, but since that turned out to be an epic fail, and western society has also largely abandoned it, we are struggling in a moral vacuum IMHO.

 

hmmm..

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 12:39

 

..well, we are struggling in a moral vacuum Chris, but that doesn't mean we should revert to superstition in order to create meaning in our lives. What I'm suggesting is something much larger than is encompassed by the scope of morality as it seems to be interpreted by most organised religions. You do NOT need a 'god' of any form to have morality. Indeed, it is counter-productive, as there can be abnegation of moral responsibility; it is far more moral if we accept responsibility not just for our actions, but the consequences, if we accept we are responsible for our life experiences.

Equally, the failure of communism is not a reason to revert to the dogma of religion. The reason we're in a moral vacuum is, IMHO, that we are making a giant leap forward in consciousness right now, away from organized religion and forward to a new form of morality, that is based on a completely different understanding of who and what we are.This means we are at a watershed, between the rigid views, the dogma and patriarchism, the suppression and fear of the past and a new way, which throws off these shackles. I'm sure you are aware we are engaged in a battle royal right now, between the forces who currently hold sway on this planet, and those of us who would break free of these mind-forged manacles.

As an brief aside, I see Don has apparently missed the point about going 'beyond mind', hence I feel somewhat disappointed.. Everything I believe we need to move forward I have expressed in my previous response - in essence. The work still has to be done.

To return to the main theme: currently we live in a world dominated by the madness of the mind. If you believe you are your mind, then you're always going to be surprised by what life throws at you, you're always going to be living in fear on some level, because the mind believes it is an entity unto itself, and therefore its prime function is self-protection. This is also often called the ego. The forces that control the status quo have always known this, thus they are able to manipulate people with ease. It used to be through religion that they manipulated us. However, the rise in political and philosophical awareness, coupled with advances in technology have meant that religion, per se, has been superceded by a new form of opiate: consumerism.

Marx got fucking close to describing a way forward out of the old order, but he failed, ultimately, because I think the world wasn't ready to embrace the concept that property is theft, simply because the majority were, and still are, programmed to believe in the concept of 'property', etc. Nevertheless, communism was part of the massive tide of change that has been sweeping through humanity since at least the Age of Enlightenment three centuries ago..

The way forward does lie within, IMHO. Jesus said this, Gandhi said this,  Buddha said this. Why do you think they all said this? Because that's where we will find the answers you're looking for. NOT in the mind! If I haven't made this clear yet, please let me make it clear now: the mind is NOT who you are. As long as you believe you are your mind, you'll remain lost. This is hippy-dippy shit, it's profound, hardcore survivalism. The mind is a tool, nothing more. Unfortunately its susceptibility to programming is enormous, hence the fact that many live life in a kind of dream; hence Buddha's 'world of illusion' etc. etc.... is anyone following this??!

Atheism, Chris, does not have to mean, indeed does not mean, absence of morality, or moral responsibility, or absence of the mystic, the magic, the wonderful. Indeed, the opposite is true: it is only when we throw off the shackles of illusion, that we will see things as they really are - Blake's 'doors of perception' that's what we're talking about. It may be revolutionary, but it's fucking essential if we're going to survive the chaos we're experiencing now.

 

 

Ego

Donaldo
3 September, 2010 - 13:16
Donaldo's picture

You say "Don has apparently missed the point".  Don says "maybe you didn't make it very well"


And how can your being be more than your mind?  I reallyy can't see that.  Even the soul is part of your mind.  Or perhaps we're using the term differntly.


Finally, much as I'm a fan of Blake, it was Huxley.  

while agreeing with elements from each argument...

rblockells
3 September, 2010 - 13:24
rblockells's picture

The greatest sensations are often not understood by the mind..when we feel strong emotions,are moved by a piece of music or a sunset or a baby's smile,these are not the products of rational thought but something within our being that we do not control or fully understand.


How to tap into this state is the big question..meditation?psychedlic drugs?religion?...mankind has strived to experience these states since time began and is  unlikely to want to  stop anytime soon.

Question

scorpion
3 September, 2010 - 14:21
scorpion's picture

Is she pregnant Ells?

it's easy Ells:

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 16:34

stop identifying with your mind. Just watch it. Keep breathing and watch your mind. Something fascinating might well occur. Stick with it. it's not rocket science, as they say, and meditation can be as simple as feeling your breath coming in and out of your nose. That exercise alone can lead you towards enlightenment.

Drugs, or better still, naturally occurring substances such as psilocybin or cannabis can help to open your perception, and loosen the bonds of the mind-forged manacles. Damn I'm quoting Blake again, has anyone got it yet???

Donaldo, you say you're a fan of Blake, but have you got a clue what he's going on about?? Blake's mind-forged manacles were inspired by Rousseau's treatise The Social Contract, where he stated succinctly, Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains. That was the Age of Enlightenment. Does anyone else get WHY it was called the Age of Enlightenment?? Do you understand what Rousseau and Blake meant, or do you think it's just a load of old gobbleydegook?

 

i've read a lot of that stuff..

rblockells
3 September, 2010 - 18:33
rblockells's picture

but i'm none the wiser.


the missus thinks i'm a basket case.

In total agreement with Don here

Boston R
3 September, 2010 - 22:12
Boston R's picture

guitars should never be allowed in a church...regardless of denomination.

Umm, Donaldo..

Hubris Goat
3 September, 2010 - 17:10

My lad, the title to Aldous Huxley's book, The Doors of Perception, is a quotation from William Blake's treatise ' The Marriage of Heaven and Hell' so I have to conclude that although you're a fan of Blake, you're not exactly au fait with all his work!

I think I did make the point well, but I accept you didn't understand it. It's quite simple: you are NOT your mind. The soul is not part of your mind. Your mind is the thing, which usually has the sound of your own voice to your inner ear, which does that activity we call thinking. But that is not who you are. YOU are able to observe the mind in action. You are not your mind. To begin with this may seem like a subtle or even trivial thing, but once you 'get it', you realise it is huge. It is only when you no longer identify with your mind as if it were your self that you start to see things clearly... that the doors of perception are cleansed, as William Blake put it...

Does that help? Are we on the same page here, or even in the same library?

 

Hud, m'friend ...

Donaldo
4 September, 2010 - 12:58
Donaldo's picture

... I don't know is we are on the same page or even that I care to be.  At the risk of being roundly patronised again, I can't really see the point in what you're on about.  All this stuff about the sould and looking at yourself from the outside.  What does it achieve?  As I said before, I view relationships and social interaction as the important things - not staring up your own arse.  Again, maybe I've misunderstood you but it all seems very 'me, me, me!'.

I've not studied Blake in any depth.  I should have said I like his pictures and some of his poems.  And I don't think what you're talking about is the same as most Enlightenment thinkers.  They we'ren't about spirituality, they were characterised by the pursuit of reason - your concept, if I read it correctly, is far more spiritual.  Still, while you're at the old Enlightenment thinking, how about a bit of Adam Smith?  Next thing you know, you'll start to reappraise Thatcherism.

Don..

Hubris Goat
4 September, 2010 - 19:22

..I surrender. You clearly don't get what I'm saying. Maybe it's at the level of semantics. I 'know' that I am talking about the same thing as Enlightenment thinkers, because Reason leads one to the same conclusions, through the same method, as I am describing. You don't/can't/won't see that.. fair dos. However, that you think what I'm talking about is all 'me, me, me' is so utterly wide of the mark as to be... amusing, I guess. It is, in fact, the contrary; for what I'm describing is where the very concept of 'me' dissolves.. it is the opposite of ego, which is purely a function of the mind.


Also, NOwhere have I said 'look at yourself from the outside' Are you willfully mis-reading what I've written, or perhaps avoiding what I've written communicates to you... ? I said 'go within', much as Jaysus, Gandhi, Buddha and countless other adepts have said. So don't take my word for it, you might just hesitate for a moment and consider why these great teachers said what they said, instead of blithely ignoring the whole thing. Staring up your own arse is an apt metaphor for what most people do on a daily basis in the Western world.


It was YOU, dear Donaldo, who said earlier in this thread that you are 'envious of the serenity that faith brings in some'.. I've just offered you the keys to find that serenity, and you've turned me down, blank. SO either you can't be arsed to find that serenity you're envious of, or you're scared of finding it, maybe? Either way, you can take a horse to water, etc. Just re-reading the pieces I've written in this thread, I think the information I've provided is clear, concise and extremely well-put, even though I say it myself.


If you'd care to read how I've tried to explain how reason is actually spiritual, you can read this on my blog: http://westofsoho.blogspot.com/2009_06_01_archive.htmlAnd On re-reading I think it needs work, but you should get the ball-park picture.


Oh, and finally, no worries, I don't mind that you took me to task for mis-quoting Blake, when I was right all along.. smily winky thing.


 

Analysis

Boston R
4 September, 2010 - 22:25
Boston R's picture

Paralysis...innit.

proof?

S.O.N.I.C
4 September, 2010 - 14:02

Nobody with any sense requires proof of the existence of God, but evidence would be nice and there isn't any that I can see apart from the fact that humans can understand how the universe works.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/7972538/Are-we-living-in-a-desi...

Life itself is evidence

Donaldo
4 September, 2010 - 14:06
Donaldo's picture

Not proof, evidence.

evidence of what?

S.O.N.I.C
4 September, 2010 - 14:29

of some "outside" influence, or of a supreme being that we should worship? despite the fact that all evidence points towards it either having no interest in our affairs or of being a bit of shit? There may or may not be a God, but there certainly isn't one worth worshipping.

The worship bit worries me, Sonners

Donaldo
4 September, 2010 - 14:40
Donaldo's picture

What sort of a being would create other creatures mainly so they could worship them?  That's wierd.

But life is evidence of God. 

How

Hubris Goat
4 September, 2010 - 19:23

is life evidence of 'God'? Casuistry of the highest order.


Explain yourself sir:

Now who's wilfully misunderstanding?

Donaldo
5 September, 2010 - 10:44
Donaldo's picture

I said eidence, not proof.  I'm not saying that I accept the evidence, but many do.

of God?

S.O.N.I.C
4 September, 2010 - 14:53

If the science in that Telegraph article I posted the link for is to be believed, then presumably in the not so distant future, you could be the creator of your very own universe/s. Would that make you God?

Have you never travelled Sonners, not experienced

Boston R
4 September, 2010 - 22:43
Boston R's picture

..the impact a Home Counties accent has on Johnny Foreigner ?  Universally Godlike.

I find

morphine apiary
5 September, 2010 - 11:05
morphine apiary's picture

rocking up into town just before a solar eclipse and giving it the big one helps.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.